Blog
New Study Finds Only 8 Percent of Sunscreens are Safe and Effective
Healthy Child
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
The fourth annual Sunscreen Guide by Environmental Working Group (EWG) gives low marks to the current crop of sunscreen products, with a few notable exceptions. EWG researchers recommend only 39, or 8 percent, of 500 beach and sport sunscreens on the market this season.
Full report here
The reason? A surge in exaggerated SPF claims (SPFs greater than 50) and recent developments in understanding the possible hazards of some sunscreen ingredients, in particular, new government data linking a form of vitamin A used in sunscreens to accelerated growth of skin tumors and lesions.
Industry's lackluster performance and the federal Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) failure to issue regulations for sunscreens lead EWG to warn consumers not to depend on any sunscreen for primary protection from the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays. Hats, clothing and shade are still the most reliable sun protection available.
Products with high SPF ratings sell a false sense of security because most people using them stay out in the sun longer, still get burned (which increases risk of skin cancer) and subject their skin to large amounts of UVA radiation, the type of sunlight that does not burn but is believed responsible for considerable skin damage and cancer. High SPF products, which protect against sunburn, often provide very little protection against UVA radiation. Also, most people don't get the high SPF they pay for: people apply about a quarter of the recommended amount. In everyday practice, a product labeled SPF 100 really performs like SPF 3.2, an SPF 30 rating equates to a 2.3 and an SPF 15 translates to 2.
"Many sunscreens available in the U.S. may be the equivalent of modern-day snake oil, plying customers with claims of broad-spectrum protection but not providing it, while exposing people to potentially hazardous chemicals that can penetrate the skin into the body," said EWG Senior Vice President for Research Jane Houlihan. "When only 8 percent of sunscreens rate high for safety and efficacy, it's clear that consumers concerned about protecting themselves and their families are left with few good options."
This year, new concerns are being raised about a vitamin A compound called retinyl palmitate, found in 41 percent of sunscreens. The FDA is investigating whether this chemical, when applied to skin that is then exposed to sunlight, may accelerate skin damage and elevate skin cancer risk. FDA data suggest that vitamin A may be photocarcinogenic, meaning that in the presence of the sun's ultraviolet rays, the compound and skin undergo complex biochemical changes resulting in cancer. The evidence against vitamin A is not conclusive, but as long as it is suspect, EWG recommends that consumers choose vitamin A-free sunscreens.
EWG has again flagged products with oxybenzone, a hormone-disrupting compound that penetrates the skin and enters the bloodstream. Biomonitoring surveys conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have detected oxybenzone in the bodies of 97 percent of Americans tested. In all, EWG researchers assessed 1,400 sunscreen products, including beach and sports lotions, sprays and creams, moisturizers, make-up and lip balms. The 39 top beach and sports products that earned EWG's "green" rating all contain the minerals zinc or titanium. EWG researchers were unable find any non-mineral sunscreens that scored better than "yellow."
Some blame falls on the FDA, which has yet to finalize regulations for sunscreens promised since 1978. FDA officials estimate that the regulations may be issued next October – but even then, they are expected to give manufacturers at least a year, and possibly longer, to comply with the new rules. That means the first federally regulated sunscreens won't go on store shelves before the summer of 2012.
"Both world wars, the creation of Medicare and the planning and execution of the moon landing combined took less time to achieve than FDA's promised sunscreen regulations," said Houlihan. "Meanwhile, more than one million cases of skin cancer are diagnosed in the U.S. every year. This could be the poster child for government inaction."
EWG is a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, DC that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment.
Find Out More:
- Understanding Sunscreen
- Natural Sunshine=A Healthy Child
- Tips When Purchasing Sunscreen
- Sunscreen Products Healthy Child Recommends
Posted by Healthy Child on 06/04/2010 at 10:43 AM
Hi Cynthia!
Dr. T’s Supergoop lotion is indeed a safer option and they have been working with EWG on appropriately rating their product. They can now be found in the database and are rated a 3 - which is the lowest any chemical blockers were rated (the lower ranked products contain mineral blockers - which are often nano-sized and are linked to another set of health risks that scientists are only beginning to understand). Unfortunately, with sunscreens - there is no perfect option. There is either a chemical risk or a nanoparticle risk, among other things. It’s very frustrating and emphasizes the fact that not only do we need better regulations, but we also need to use other methods to protect our skin like wearing UV barrier clothing, large brimmed hats, etc - while still getting the enough sunshine to absorb the Vitamin D so vital to our health (see http://healthychild.org/blog/comments/natural_sunshine_healthy_child). It’s a real balancing act!
Also, as you probably noticed above - I said Supergoop lotion is a chemical blocker. It’s very important to understand that nothing is chemical-free and any claim to be so is patently false. All of life is made up of chemicals - some safer than others. Read more here:
http://healthychild.org/blog/comments/can_products_actually_be_chemical_free/
Please let us know if you have any further questions. we’re here to help!
—Janelle
Posted by Cynthia Norris on 06/03/2010 at 03:11 PM
I did recently purchase Dr. T’s Supergoop, which is supposed to be made in conjuction with Healthy Child Healthy World’s strict standards. However, I am concerned that is does not say “Chemical Free” and it is not anywhere to be found on EWG’s list of recommended sunscreens. Nor does it come up in their database. Any helpful comments?
More comments:
Get Answers
View AllRead and Learn
It's the trusted guidebook for the Next Generation of Parenting "...that every single parent needs to read..."
PICK UP A COPY
Now In Paperback!







Posted by shareelynn on 07/10/2010 at 10:04 AM
Dr. T’s supergoop is on their list now, maybe they just added it. :)